Experimental modernism, serialism, and textual quasinationalist theory

Susan Roeder
Department of African Studies, University of North Texas

1. Contexts of obligation

When we grapple with de-Schenkerian "scientific" theory, we are confronted by a paradox: one can accept structuralist composition or, on the other hand, one can decide that politics, subversively, has intrinsic meaning. But expression's deconstructing of music espouses textual quasinationalist theory. (The principal thesis of Shreffler's[1] monograph on structuralist composition is the role of the composer as observer-listener.) Solomon promotes the use of the rationalist concepts of music to challenge and modify language. Therefore several theories relating to Adornoist dialectic persist.

"Culture is fictionalized," writes Wagner. The musician/artist has a dilemma: (a) reject Cheng's model of structuralist composition and consequently accept that performance is capable of mere masturbation, or (b) reject Wagner's critique of structuralist composition. (Textual quasinationalist theory holds that narrative is a product of notated music, given that the premise of Adornoist dialectic is uncertain.) If cultural performance is false, we have to choose between structuralist composition and textual quasinationalist theory. However, the characteristic focus of the works of Crawford is a redundant entity. But when could trans-romantic romanticism, imperceptably constrained by feminine "clandestine" composition, restate, we should insist manifest, textual quasinationalist theory?

In a sense, the subject is restated into a Adornoist dialectic that includes musical form as a whole. This sensitivity, or as some might say hermeneutic futility, can be seen in measures 83-94 of Oliveros's Sonic Meditations (contra Abbate [2]), and yet stronger in bars 263-281 and 75-78. Composition's instating of society, and insistence on analyzing the society prevalent in society, condemns "scientific" ambiguity. (My forthcoming personal discoveries about Adornoist dialectic discovered that a statement like "memory is part of the newness of sexuality" cannot exist.) It could be said that "Koyaanisqatsi" examines tonality in the places where "Music with Changing Parts" reframes atonality.

E.g., Wagner uses the term "textual quasinationalist theory" to denote the defining characteristic, and eventually the failure, of proto-textual art. Though conservative musicologists attempt to reinforce conservative physicality, the contributions of subcultures, on the contrary, problematize physicality and uphold liberal physicality, foregrounding diverse actors. (Amati-Camperi[3]) But the composer has a dilemma: either accept Heidegger's analysis of structuralist composition and reflexively reject that music has real worth or, on the other hand, accept Dubiel's essay on structuralist composition and rightly be complicit in that ambiguity may be used to reinforce the canon. Thus Abbate suggests the use of the neo-Schenkerianist ideal of analysis to analyse composition vis-a-vis culture.

Marx's monograph on Adornoist dialectic holds that the purpose of the (ethno-)musicologist is mere masturbation. But how could the analyst (rather constrained by cultural narrative) read, some must assert marginalize, society, conversely fleeing a post-post-romanticist triadic Adornoist dialectic? The object is manifested into a sub-urbanist romanticism that subsumes scholarship under a paradox. If Adornoist dialectic be true, we have to pick between structuralist composition and musicology of caring. Hence several performances about the dialectic, and subsequent stasis, of "material" society cannot exist, and each can be affirmed individually.

2. Performances of form

"We must conflate music as a preamble, from whence we can begin to respell music." So asserted Adorno in "Dissonanzen: Musik in der verwalteten Welt" (not to be confused with Ecoist open form). It could be said that my auto-ethnographical thoughts about textual quasinationalist theory suggest a linguistics of new perspectives in the Bloomian-canonist style. Listening's feeling of sexuality denies, or indeed affirms, Adornoist dialectic. (The genius, or rather collapse, quotes mm. 272-290 of Rorem's String Quartet No. 3 throughout mm. 257-264 and 138-162.)

In a larger sense, e.g., Eco uses the term "romantic pre-textual theory" to denote the difference between history and society. The Other/self distinction depicted in Reich's "Pendulum Music" emerges again in "Clapping Music", to a modernist mindset. Nevertheless why might, we must write would, textual quasinationalist theory, obviously standing up to a "scientific" continous structuralist composition, entrench, or even reinforce, modes of exclusion? The response is absurd. The critic has a paradox: (a) reject Machaut's critique of Adornoist dialectic and subsequently accept that context comes from notated music, or (b) reject Brett's analysis of Adornoist dialectic.

However, the theme of the works of Reich is the role of the participant as performer-musicologist. Born promotes the use of meta-romantic composition to rehear homophobia. Many proto-appropriations concerning not ambiguity, as Born would have it, but trans-ambiguity may be uncovered, each Wright reiterates in turn [4]. Harris[5] states that we have to choose between textual quasinationalist theory and structuralist composition.

3. Monk redecoupled

In the works of Muhly, the most important concept is the defining of cultural disability. Where hierarchies respell uncritical politics, diverse actors challenge politics and overcome by upholding ambiguous politics, enriching Marxist cryptographicism. But the individual is contextualized into a structuralist composition that encompasses truth within a totality. Yet why could popular music distort the Conservatory, conversely perhaps paradoxically hampered by a sexualist so-called modern canon? In a sense, Derrida's model of Adornoist dialectic implies that the significance of the listener is progression. (Ethnomusicology's deconstructing of society, and insistence instead on situating the society prevalent in society, indexes textual quasinationalist theory.) Thus my previous investigations relating to a self-repeating entity revealed that a statement like "physicality may be used to negate subcultures" cannot be found (the Nietzscheist notions of the statement are obvious). It could be said that for instance, Born uses the term "structuralist composition" to denote the absurdity, and some would say the modulation, of clandestinist music.

If textual bimusicalist theory is true, the works of Muhly are reminiscent of Monk. The economy is also evident in mm. 139-151 of Beach's Mass, albeit in a redundant mode in bars 255-272, 21-37, and (in retrograde) in 127-141. The artist has a choice: one can accept Timberlake's essay on Adornoist dialectic or, alternatively, one can reject Straus's monograph on Adornoist dialectic. The Haupttema of Ingolfsson's[6] critique of Solieist difference is the role of the observer per se as composer/improviser. An abundance of self-prolongations concerning structuralist composition exist, and each of which should be condemned in turn.

Why can meta-"sonorous" serialism (somewhat subversively trapped by the post-cultural conceptualist theory) prolong society? (Adorno suggests the use of Adornoist dialectic to attack elitism.) Ergo, Ronyak[7] suggests that we have to choose between structuralist composition and textual quasinationalist theory. The premise of Adornoist dialectic implies that the Conservatory is a human construction, but only if language is interchangeable with art.

4. Structuralist composition and Solomonist peacock-culture

The primary idea of Bent's[8] analysis of romantic ambiguity is a textual paradox. On one thing, Monk was right: However, expression's deconstructing of memory contrasts Solomonist peacock-culture. Therefore as an example, Solomon uses the term "super-hermeneutic minimalism" to denote a common-practice whole. In a sense, although outmoded musicologists try to respell archaic, static performance, the contributions of women's rights read around performance and amplify Global performance, advancing popular culture.

If one examines structuralist composition, one is faced with a choice: either accept all-too-modernism qua modernist structuralist theory or, on the contrary, conclude that composition is capable of truth. The analyst is restated into a textual quasinationalist theory that merges musical form with a worth system. But might, indeed should, Beckerman modify, one could argue contextualize, Solomonist peacock-culture? In "Musicology and Difference," Solie enforces structuralist composition; in "Defining Feminism: Conundrums, Contexts, Communities", though, she alters her stance, turning an ear to Heideggerist hermeneutics.

My investigations about voicelessness promote a scholarship of remorse in the Marxian-narrativeist vein. The principal thesis of the works of Solie is the obligation, and hence the paradigm, of quasi"Schenkerian" music. A number of improvisations relating to the common ground between culture vis-a-vis ambiguity and scholarship cannot exist. (If Chengist musicology of caring be true, we have to decide between Solomonist peacock-culture and textual quasinationalist theory.)

However, the sensitivity can be seen in measures 69-95 of Wagner's Goetterdammerung in mm. 5-15 and inverted in 128-153. In a larger sense, Brett promotes the use of structuralist composition to challenge and read music. But the critic has a dilemma: one can reject Reese's model of cultural theory or, usefully, one can accept Eco's essay on cultural theory and subsequently be complicit in that physicality, perhaps surprisingly, has real worth, given that disability is equal to truth. Hence Cusick's analysis of power/pleasure/intimacy triad states that the goal of the musicologist is prolongation, but only if Bloom's monograph on textual quasinationalist theory is a challenge; if that is not the case, narrative is created by the composers.

How must the bystander--somewhat paradoxically defined by a "scientific" textual canon--reinforce sexism, conversely totally standing up to the neo-romantic structuralist composition? Music's promoting of society, and insistence instead on voicing the semiotics of society, examines, better reenacts, Solomonist peacock-culture. For instance, Brett uses the term "rationalist nationalism" to denote de-, post-, and so-called composition. Where globalizations entrench canonical sexuality, gay studies problematize sexuality and succeed in empowering experimental sexuality, envoicing textual quasinationalist theory.

5. Solie and structuralist composition

"We must rehear music before we sustain music." So posited Brett (echoing Bizet) at the beginning of "Editing Renaissance Music"--not to insist we shouldn't attempt it. My unpublished auto-ethnographical discoveries about textual quasinationalist theory discovered that a statement like "society is history" cannot exist. The object is decoupled into a proto-clandestine concept(s) of context that includes disability as a totality. It could be said that several proto-theorizings concerning the role of the (ethno-)musicologist as performer-participant are, perhaps surprisingly, uncovered, each MacCarthy analyses individually [9].

"Language is intrinsically fictionalized," says Derrida; however, according to Solie[10] , it is not so much language that is intrinsically fictionalized, but rather the stasis of language. This idea has historical precedent: (The futility, and subsequent pigeonholing, of textual quasinationalist theory which is a central argument of Solie's "Music in Other Words: Victorian Conversations" emerges further in "Guglielmo Gonzaga and the Castrati", though rather tangentally.) Thus any number of self-performances relating to Solomonist peacock-culture cannot be revealed, and every one will be espoused separately. New organology holds that politics may be used to transgress otherwise growing women, given that memory is in binary opposition to art. However, the focus characterizing Clemmens's[11] critique of structuralist composition is a redundant entity. In a larger sense, Varwig[12] states that we have to pick between Solomonist peacock-culture and Solomonist peacock-culture.

Nevertheless for whom can minimalist capitalist theory consign, indeed privilege, the listener? A post-romantic "material" response is given in Cage's "I-VI". Born promotes the use of textual quasinationalist theory to attack neoliberal perceptions of society. The defining characteristic, or as some might say cultural newness, quotes measures 273-283 of Saariaho's Du cristal, albeit in a more "scientific" sense, and yet stronger throughout measures 201-202, 69-79, and inverted in 23-33, also foreshadowed in the oeuvre of Haydn. The artist has a choice: either accept Ives's essay on structuralist composition or accept Oja's model of structuralist composition.

Ergo, if Solomonist peacock-culture be false, we have to choose between semioticist ambiguity and Kramerist other-voicedness. Performance's entrenching of music reframes structuralist composition. (Kramer uses the term "textual quasinationalist theory" to denote not analysis, but sub-analysis.) Although white, male critics seek to respell capitalist sexuality, the contributions of subcultures, on the other hand, attack sexuality and advance popular sexuality, bolstering the Other.

In a sense, Wagner's analysis of Leitmotiv implies that the goal of the musicker is artistic comment. It could be said that listening's reassessing of composition, and insistence instead on feeling the ambiguity intrinsic to composition, indexes Solomonist peacock-culture. Slim[13] states that the works of Cage are empowering. The subject is manifested into a textual experimentalism that subsumes disability under a paradox.

In conclusion, it is clear that some connections among textual quasinationalist theory, structuralist composition, and Solomonist peacock-culture (not to mention trans-romantic narrative, which will be the topic of our upcoming book) are moving in the direction of a post-romanticist goal. More examination of Crawford's works, especially Study in Mixed Accents, in conjunction with Strausist disability musicology and the observer's conceptual proto-construction will be the key to progression.

1. Shreffler, Anna ed. (1973) Reinventing Expressionism: Textual quasinationalist theory in the works of Monk. Scarecrow Press

2. Abbate, M. ed./trans. (1986) Serialism, Glass, and textual quasinationalist theory. M.I.T. Press

3. Amati-Camperi, Rene (1921) Structuralist composition in the music of Reich. Edward Mellyn Press

4. Wright, B. (1978) Textual quasinationalist theory in the music of Bjork. Oxford University Press

5. Harris, Jessica ed. (2013) The Sounding Door: Structuralist composition in the works of Muhly. Scarecrow Press

6. Ingolfsson, G. Ll. (1897) Textual quasinationalist theory in the works of Solie. W.W. Norton

7. Ronyak, John ed./trans. (2006) Realist Performances: Structuralist composition against textual quasinationalist theory. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Press

8. Bent, P. A. J. ed. (1989) Textual quasinationalist theory contra structuralist composition. University of Georgia Press

9. MacCarthy, Arni (1974) Textual quasinationalist theory after Ross. Boston University Press

10. Solie, U. ed. (1882) Textual quasinationalist theory in the works of Shaw. Indiana University Press

11. Clemmens, Christoph (1930) Scholarship, performance vis-a-vis musical form, and culture: Textual quasinationalist theory in the writings of Cage. McGraw Hill

12. Varwig, E. ed. (1985) Commonplace/Exotic: Textual quasinationalist theory in the music of Boulez. Wesleyan University Press

13. Slim, Emily ed. (1914) Structuralist composition in the music of Crawford. M.I.T. Press

Automatic bad new musicology paper generator: based on the Postmodernist essay generator and the Dada engine.


In the further interest of self-parody, I am starting work on an Old Musicology random essay generator; please email me with ideas. All I know is that every paper will begin "On f. 3v, a new watermark ..." etc.