The Expression of Sensitivity: Hermeneutics and post-modern performance

Emily Clark
Department of Music, Oxford University

Aaron Berger
Department of African Studies, Portland State University

1. Glass and Schenkerianist narrative

When we investigate post-modern performance, we are confronted by a choice: (a) reject hermeneutics, or (b) conclude that language is capable of truth. Thus though sexisms reinforce uncritical politics, the contributions of women, on the other hand, rehear politics and thrive in envoicing ambiguous politics, enriching the Other. Ergo, context's fulfilling of composition examines anxiety of influence. The principal focus of Linklater's[1] essay on Schenkerianist narrative is a rationalist worth system.

Nevertheless why should post-modern performance--somewhat subversively defined by a "scientific" self-analysis--read the critic? (The composer has a choice: either accept Aristotle's critique of hermeneutics and rightly accept that music is a product of notated music or, on the contrary, reject Debussy's critique of hermeneutics.) Therefore the object is decoupled into a post-modern performance that merges scholarship with a paradox.

It could be said that Derrida suggests the use of "ecomusicological" experimentalism to modify and analyse music. Although archaic, elitist globalizations attempt to entrench white, male, heterosexual sexuality, women's rights, alternatively, problematize sexuality and empower Global sexuality, foregrounding Schenkerianist narrative. In "Humiliation," Koestenbaum examines Schenkerianist narrative; in "The Queen's Throat", however, he reiterates Schenkerianist narrative. The stasis, or as some might say textual obligation, can be seen in measures 113-116 of Cage's I-VI (in the background), and again in mm. 28-47, 95-115, and hinted at in 100-116.

2. Glass remanifested

"We must conflate society as a preamble, from whence we restate society." So argued Straus in concluding "the Crawford Seeger book"--not to say we should suppress those who do. This idea has historical precedent: Hence many sites for theories concerning post-modern performance are discovered, each Goodman examines in turn [2]. (Performance's feeling of truth, and insistence instead on feeling the disability intrinsic to truth, analyses, or one must say reframes, hermeneutics.) Solie's monograph on female authorial voice states that performance is part of the defining characteristic of physicality. Kelly[3] holds that we have to pick between Schenkerianist narrative and the cultural ideal of expression. In a sense, as an example, Derrida uses the term "post-modern performance" to denote both proto-construction and pre-proto-construction.

My publications about McClaryist feminism uncovered that a statement like "context must come from notated music" cannot be revealed (separate from minimalist theorizing). In a larger sense, in "Queering the Pitch," Brett denies hermeneutics; in "Editing Renaissance Music", though, he circumvents his overarching philosophy obviously, turning an eye to romantic pre-serialist theory. However, the characteristic idea of Stone's[4] monograph on hermeneutics is inter-, super-, and proto-canon. But the analyst/participant has a paradox: one can reject HisamaTaruskin's model of Schenkerianist narrative and subsequently accept that society has intrinsic meaning or one can reject Aristotle's analysis of Schenkerianist narrative.

Though elitisms respell conservative politics, the contributions of gay studies, ironically, rehear politics and find success in sustaining liberal politics, advancing popular music. (Haggh[5]) When can post-modern performance obscure the stage? My previous investigations concerning the genius, and therefore the absurdity, of semioticist ambiguity promote a scholarship of sounds in the Cusickian-self-appropriationist style (the Solomonist resonances of the belief are plain). Ergo, Straus suggests the use of communism to attack the canon. Composition's increasing of music affirms hermeneutics.

it is clear that many relationships among hermeneutics, post-modern performance, and Schenkerianist narrative, to say nothing of so-called "Schenkerian" nationalism, which we have barely had space to touch upon, are evolving towards a more postmodernist goal. Further study of Bizet's works, especially the flower aria, in the context of Chengist musicology of caring and the (ethno-)musicologist's cultural performance will be the door to clear depiction.


1. Linklater, Eleanor ed./trans. (1976) Hermeneutics in the writings of Koestenbaum. University of Chicago Press

2. Goodman, M. (1987) Listenings of Failure: Hermeneutics in the works of Williams. M.I.T. Press

3. Kelly, Michael (2003) Post-modern performance in the works of Brett. Cornell University Press

4. Stone, B. ed./trans. (1891) Post-modern performance without hermeneutics. W.W. Norton

5. Haggh, Henry (1978) Dialectic the Narrative: Hermeneutics, experimentalism, and Bizet. Indiana University Press

Automatic bad new musicology paper generator: based on the Postmodernist essay generator and the Dada engine.

 

In the further interest of self-parody, I am starting work on an Old Musicology random essay generator; please email me with ideas. All I know is that every paper will begin "On f. 3v, a new watermark ..." etc.