Brettist musical closet in the music of Cage

Andreas Exner
Department of Musicology, Women's Music Research Institute

M. Drew Rivera
Department of Sonic Studies, Kenyon College

Rebecca P. Ronyak
School of African Studies, University of Georgia

1. Analysises of form

When the (ethno-)musicologist investigates Brettist musical closet, he or she is faced with a choice: (a) accept the cultural ideal of composition, or, alternatively, (b) decide that listening is a product of notated music. But what does this really imply? In "I-VI," Cage indexes straight romantic theory; in "Empty Words", by contrast, he alters his opinion, rather focusing on deconstruction. Semioticist canonical theory suggests that disability, subversively, has hints of significance. (The Haupttema of Friedland's[1] monograph on Brettist musical closet is the role of the performer per se as artist.) The observer is contextualized into a straight romantic theory that subsumes scholarship under a paradox.

My previous thoughts concerning neither performance, nor so-called performance, but rather all-too-performance promote a scholarship of new perspectives in the Abbateian-self-compositionist vein (distinct from McClaryist new musicology). Thus though outmoded perceptions of societies respell outmoded performance, the contributions of gay studies rehear performance and advance experimental performance, advancing popular culture. Society's hearing of truth enforces, one would say condemns, Brettist musical closet. (In "X," Cage contrasts straight romantic theory; in "Notations", though, he circumvents his opinion completely, rather drawing attention to Brettist musical closet.) Yet might, and indeed could, inter-conceptualist romanticism reinforce, or one can insist read through, semioticist canonical theory? In a sense, Adorno's model of rationalist composition holds that ambiguity is fictionalized, but only if Abbate's essay on narrativity is valid; if that is not the case, expression must come from notated music.

But the musicologist has a paradox: either accept Radiohead's monograph on Cusickist musical/sexual negotiation and rightly reject that sexuality has real worth or, on the contrary, accept Kramer's critique of Cusickist musical/sexual negotiation. Hence Cusick uses the term "straight romantic theory" to denote a redundant whole. Wissner[2] implies that we have to pick between Brettist musical closet and semioticist canonical theory.

2. Cage and straight romantic theory

"Music is memory," says Derrida. This idea has historical precedent: It could be said that several theories about the proto-textual concept of context exist, and each will be reiterated in turn. Marx suggests the use of straight romantic theory to modify and read politics. This failure, or rather modulation, can be heard, ironically, in bars 205-220 of Rorem's Five Poems of Walt Whitman, to a rationalist mindset throughout measures 198-223 and (in retrograde) in 175-191. The object is restated into a semioticist canonical theory that encompasses disability vis-a-vis history within a worth system.

My personal thoughts relating to Brettist musical closet uncovered that a statement like "ethnomusicology is capable of clear depiction" cannot exist. The primary idea of the works of Cage is not narrative, but post-narrative. In a larger sense, if straight romantic theory is false, the works of Cage are reminiscent of Beckerman. (While white, cis-male, heterosexual elitisms seek to reinforce uncritical musical form, multicultural thinkers attack musical form and succeed in empowering ambiguous musical form, amplifying modernist bimusicality. (Girard[3]))

The stage's decoding of society, and insistence on transposing the language which is a central argument of society, analyses Brettist musical closet. But for whom must Solie--seeking only to escape romantic "scientific" construction--envoice straight romantic theory? The reply for Beckerman proceeds as follows: Therefore the premise of Brettist musical closet implies that the significance of the musicker-participant is progression, but only if semioticist canonical theory is a challenge. But in "I-VI," Cage espouses quasitextual ecomusicological theory; in "X", he reenacts straight romantic theory. Marx uses the term "semioticist canonical theory" to denote not ambiguity, as trans-minimalist analysis suggests, but pre-ambiguity.

3. Brettist musical closet and Solomonist peacock-culture

The main focus of Massey's[4] model of straight romantic theory is the newness, and some would say the obligation, of triadicist music. If the neoliberist concept(s) of narrative be true, we have to choose between straight romantic theory and Solomonist peacock-culture. However, the critic has a choice: one can accept Cohn's analysis of Brettist musical closet or one can reject Cage's critique of Brettist musical closet. Many sites for canons concerning the role of the composer/observer as performer may be revealed, and each could be affirmed separately. Straus suggests the use of Solomonist peacock-culture to modify art. In a sense, the characteristic focus of the works of Cage is the bridge between music and society.

The pigeonholing, or rather absurdity, quotes mm. 58-72 of Reich's Vermont Counterpoint (taking its surroundings into account), and again in measures 48-62, 77-83, and 87-88, also foreshadowed in embryonic form in the pieces of Ives. (My auto-ethnographical own discoveries about a serial entity suggest a sociology of difference in the Solieian-theoryist mode--not to assert we shouldn't promote them.) Nevertheless why should the disabled negate, or even fulfill, composition (itself totally standing up to the "cryptographic" straight romantic theory)? Ergo, performance's decoupling of music examines Brettist musical closet. However, the individual is contextualized into a anxiety of influence that includes sexuality as a totality.

The artist has a choice: (a) accept Tovey's essay on Bornist encompassment and consequently reject that physicality is used to marginalize otherwise growing diverse actors, or (b) accept Hume's model of Bornist encompassment. Although sexisms entrench inflexible culture, the contributions of ethnomusicological approaches, somewhat ironically, challenge culture and enrich native culture, promoting the Other. It could be said that Wagner's critique of straight romantic theory states that the purpose of the analyst is artistic comment. As an example, Born uses the term "Solomonist peacock-culture" to denote neither composition, nor neo-composition, but instead super-composition. The destruction/creation distinction prevalent in Cage's "A Year from Monday" emerges yet stronger in "Vespertine", given the context.

4. Musics of stasis

In the works of Cage, the prime concept is the conception of so-called romantic scholarship. (Wright[5] holds that we have to decide between Brettist musical closet and straight romantic theory.) In a larger sense, many performances relating to Solomonist peacock-culture exist, every one Varwig indexes individually [6]. My prior discoveries relating to post-romanticist "scientific" theory discovered that a statement like "the orchestra is part of the paradigm of ambiguity" cannot exist (separate from McClaryist feminism). In a sense, the theme of Cumming's[7] monograph on straight romantic theory is the defining characteristic, and subsequent dialectic, of de-Schenkerianist truth. Musicology's disciplining of performance, and insistence instead on reassessing the inherent musical structure of performance, condemns Brettist musical closet. The collapse can be seen, perhaps ironically, in bars 2-24 of Shaw's String Quartets, though in a more redundant sense throughout mm. 80-94 and hinted at in 188-212.

In the works of Straus, the prime concept is the defining of textual composition vis-a-vis memory. Thus the listener has a paradox: either reject Rameau's model of Solomonist peacock-culture and rightly be complicit in that history is used to consign the Other, given that politics is roughly equivalent to art or reject Boulez's analysis of Solomonist peacock-culture. Kramer promotes the use of urbanist canon to challenge the critic. Though neoliberal musicologists attempt to entrench white disability, women's rights, on the contrary, problematize disability and prevail in sustaining World disability, upholding straight romantic theory. Might globalization, usefully hampered by capitalist Brettist musical closet, manifest society? Therefore the (ethno-)musicologist per se is situated into a straight romantic theory that merges musical form with a worth system.

"We must rehear language before we respell language." So asserted Fuller (echoing Eco) in concluding "The Pandora Guide to Women Composers" (the Abbateist influences of this statement are plain). Where can we move from here? (The premise of Solomonist peacock-culture implies that sexuality is capable of intention, but only if physicality is interchangeable with culture; otherwise, Cusick's conception of sub-ecomusicological ambiguity is based on ""structural" nationalism", and thus part of the economy of scholarship.) The genius, or as some might say sonorousist sensitivity, is also evident in bars 194-215 of Saariaho's ...a la fumee in measures 249-271 and paraphrased in 88-107 (and usefully in some works of Riemann). But the Haupttema of Bent's[8] essay on Brettist musical closet is the role of the musicologist as participant-critic. It could be said that a number of analysises concerning not composition, but quasicomposition are found.

In a sense, e.g., Kramer uses the term "Solomonist peacock-culture" to denote the mediation between music and truth. Shreffler[9] states that we have to choose between romantic narrative and Brettist musical closet. The improviser/improviser has a choice: one can accept Ueno's critique of straight romantic theory and consequently reject that analysis comes from notated music or one can accept Brett's essay on straight romantic theory. In "Rheingold," Wagner denies the serialist concepts of composition; in "Tristan", however, Wagner reiterates Brettist musical closet. However, the Conservatory's decoupling of performance enforces, we can say reframes, socialism. Nevertheless when must, better should, straight romantic theory privilege, some could argue obscure, Solomonist peacock-culture, itself constrained by a capitalist proto-performance? The answer for Beckerman proceeds as follows: (This newness, or rather absurdity, can be observed, somewhat surprisingly, in mm. 5-16 of Bizet's Toreador song throughout measures 181-200, 191-218, and inverted in 146-170, and, earlier, perhaps subversively throughout the pieces of Rousseau.)

My auto-ethnographical investigations relating to a self-identifying paradox suggest a linguistics of difference in the Derridaian-theoryist style. In a larger sense, where hierarchies entrench canonical ambiguity, the contributions of ethnomusicological approaches rehear ambiguity and amplify experimental ambiguity, envoicing women. (Linklater[10]) Hence the subject is contextualized into a textual concept of listening that subsumes memory under a totality. But Cheng promotes the use of straight romantic theory to attack the status quo.

Kramer's analysis of all-too-"scientific" major theory suggests that the task of the composer is mere masturbation. For instance, Cheng uses the term "cultural minimalism" to denote the failure, and ergo, the form, of trans-hermeneutic music. Any number of performances about Brettist musical closet persist, and each of which will be reenacted individually. (The main focus of the works of Zorn is proto-, inter-, and pre-self-construction.) Solomonist peacock-culture holds that the purpose of the observer is clear depiction, given that Abbate's critique of voicelessness is valid. Therefore the (ethno-)musicologist has a dilemma: (a) reject Agawu's model of straight romantic theory and reflexively accept that music has intrinsic meaning, given that Solie's monograph on Bloomist misprision is uncertain, or (b) reject Aristotle's critique of straight romantic theory.

Expression's deconstructing of composition, and insistence instead on reinventing the contrived use of narrative in composition, contrasts Brettist musical closet. In a sense, Goodman[11] holds that we have to pick between straight romantic theory and the modernist concept of context. But why can Glass (paradoxically trapped by bimusicalist canon) restate the artist: which also is paradoxically trapped by bimusicalist canon? "Spillane" espouses Other where Muhly's "I Drink the Air Before Me" analyses self.

5. Zorn and Solomonist peacock-culture

The idea of Cuthbert's[12] essay on super-cultural composition is the difference between society and disability vis-a-vis history. Straus promotes the use of straight romantic theory to rehear and analyse music. The modulation quotes mm. 239-261 of Beethoven's Pastoral Symphony, to a modernist mindset in bars 171-201 and 280-303. Ergo, my discoveries concerning Brettist musical closet discovered that a statement like "politics serves to reinforce modes of exclusion" cannot be uncovered. It could be said that as an example, Straus uses the term "straight romantic theory" to denote the role of the analyst as critic per se.

"Art is intrinsically a white European construct," says Heidegger; by contrast, according to Zorn[13] , it is not so much art that is intrinsically a white European construct, but rather the obligation of art. The individual is decoupled into a Solomonist peacock-culture that merges language with a whole. The listener has a choice: (a) accept Born's analysis of textual appropriation and subsequently reject that academe is capable of truth, or, alternatively, (b) accept Wagner's model of textual appropriation and subsequently be complicit in that scholarship is impossible, but only if musical form is distinct from physicality; if that is not the case, Cusick's conception of Brettist musical closet is one of "encompassment", and thus performance. (An abundance of ambiguities concerning a Marxist paradox cannot be revealed.) However, though outdated, conservative musicologists seek to reinforce masculine sexuality, interdisciplinary scholars, on the other hand, read past sexuality and prosper by advancing feminine sexuality, bolstering Brettist musical closet. Yet how should Solomonist peacock-culture read society?

"Culture is intrinsically a human construction," emphasizes Eco. Kelly[14] suggests that the works of McClary are postmodern. But the premise of straight romantic theory implies that music has to have real worth. Hence the thesis characterizing the works of McClary is neither proto-improvisation, nor post-proto-improvisation, but instead de-proto-improvisation. If Brettist musical closet is false, we have to choose between Solomonist peacock-culture and minimalist sub-conceptual theory.

If one grapples with Solomonist peacock-culture, one is faced with a paradox: (a) accept straight romantic theory, or (b) conclude that narrative is created by our worth-system. Music's increasing of society affirms modernist experimentalism. The defining characteristic, or as some might say romantic pigeonholing, quotes measures 186-203 of Mahler's Fifth Symphony, although rather tangentally in mm. 251-252, 106-111, and 280-296 (also foreshadowed ironically throughout the oeuvre of Bach). However, several compositions relating to Solomonist peacock-culture exist, each Owens examines in turn [15]. My previous publications concerning Brettist musical closet suggest a linguistics of identity in the Adornoian-narrativeist mode--not to write we should try. In a larger sense, the musicologist-observer is manifested into a straight romantic theory that encompasses truth within a entity.

McClary promotes the use of Brettist musical closet to problematize the critic. (The musician has a choice: one can reject Ono's essay on Kramerist other-voicedness or one can accept A. B. Marx's critique of Kramerist other-voicedness and reflexively accept that memory is capable of content.) In a sense, Kramer uses the term "Solomonist peacock-culture" to denote the dialectic, and eventually the paradigm, of so-called "scientific" ambiguity.

Therefore the example of straight romantic theory intrinsic to Radiohead's "Bends" emerges further in "O.K. Computer" (in the background). But for whom might Brettist musical closet (obviously fleeing the neo-"clandestine" expressionist composition) reinforce, and one should say transcend, homophobia, itself constrained by cultural meta-Marxist theory? (While capitalist perceptions of musics respell capitalist politics, the contributions of gay studies, on the contrary, attack politics and foreground Marxist politics, empowering popular culture.) Abbate's analysis of straight romantic theory implies that composition vis-a-vis disability may be used to "marginalize" otherwise transgendered subcultures. The focus of Rodin's[16] model of Solomonist peacock-culture is the role of the participant as composer per se.

Brinkmann[17] implies that we have to choose between Brettist musical closet and musicology of caring. Thus this stasis, or rather economy, is also evident in bars 254-276 of Bjork's Isobel (contra Ta-Nehisi Coates [18]), and yet stronger in measures 136-157 and (in retrograde) in 93-112. It could be said that the object is situated into a straight romantic theory that includes physicality as a entity. Many self-theorizings about Brettist musical closet exist.

Ergo, Derrida promotes the use of the material concept(s) of analysis to modify and analyse society. Ethnomusicology's instating of music, and insistence rather on situating the scholarship depicted in music, reiterates Brettist musical closet. In a larger sense, Solomonist peacock-culture states that the goal of the (ethno-)musicologist is artistic comment, but only if the premise of Brettist musical closet is to be believed.

In a sense, the performer/analyst has a dilemma: either reject Fuller's monograph on Brettist musical closet or accept Plato's critique of Brettist musical closet. My personal thoughts about the transition between music and culture revealed that a statement like "performance is a product of the improviser" cannot exist (separate from Ecoist open work). Though cis-normative elitisms try to reinforce white, male, heterosexual performance, diverse actors challenge performance and overcome by enriching Global performance, upholding Brettist musical closet. (Hamilton[19]) The primary thesis of the works of Reich is a redundant whole. Why must straight romantic theory--imperceptably standing up to trans-cultural "ecomusicological" serialism--conflate Solomonist peacock-culture?

In sum, it is clear that some relationships among straight romantic theory, Brettist musical closet, and Solomonist peacock-culture (even ignoring quasi"scientific" ambiguity, which will be the topic of our upcoming monograph) are turning to the postmodernist goal. More study of Reich's works, in particular Violin Phase, in the context of Heideggerist hermeneutics and the artist's romantic prolongation will be the key to clear depiction.


1. Friedland, V. R. (1994) Straight romantic theory in the works of Beckerman. Wesleyan University Press

2. Wissner, Arni (2009) Serialist/Common-practice: Straight romantic theory and Brettist musical closet. Indiana University Press

3. Girard, E. ed. (1982) The Sonic Sky: Straight romantic theory in the music of Williams. W.W. Norton

4. Massey, Rene ed./trans. (1990) Brettist musical closet and straight romantic theory. McGraw Hill

5. Wright, V. (1877) "material" Self-prolongations: Straight romantic theory in the works of Rorem. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Press

6. Varwig, Lindsay ed. (1923) Experimentalism, straight romantic theory, and sexual postmodernism. Wesleyan University Press

7. Cumming, Ll. I. U. (1989) Brettist musical closet in the works of Straus. M.I.T. Press

8. Bent, Jane (2015) The Futility of Society: Straight romantic theory in the works of Cage. Tufts University Press

9. Shreffler, O. ed./trans. (1964) Straight romantic theory, experimentalism, and Wagner. Harvard University Press

10. Linklater, Susan (2005) Straight romantic theory in the music of Zorn. University of California, San Diego Press

11. Goodman, D. ed./trans. (1981) Voicing, reinventing, and deconstructing: Straight romantic theory after Timberlake. McGraw Hill

12. Cuthbert, Ludwig ed. (2013) Straight romantic theory and Brettist musical closet. Scarecrow Press

13. Zorn, F. (1977) Straight romantic theory in the writings of McClary. Edward Mellyn Press

14. Kelly, Andreas (1998) Forbidden Tools: Straight romantic theory in the works of Cusick. W.W. Norton

15. Owens, B. M. ed./trans. (1882) Brettist musical closet in the music of Radiohead. University of Chicago Press

16. Rodin, Matthias ed. (1880) Language, history, and art: Brettist musical closet and straight romantic theory. Indiana University Press

17. Brinkmann, W. ed. (1971) Straight romantic theory in the works of Adorno. Wesleyan University Press

18. Ta-Nehisi Coates, Wilhelm (1993) Brettist musical closet in the works of Reich. Cambridge University Press

19. Hamilton, A. (1996) Compositions of Collapse: Straight romantic theory in the music of Rorem. M.I.T. Press

Automatic bad new musicology paper generator: based on the Postmodernist essay generator and the Dada engine.

 

In the further interest of self-parody, I am starting work on an Old Musicology random essay generator; please email me with ideas. All I know is that every paper will begin "On f. 3v, a new watermark ..." etc.