Defining characteristic the Music: Textual rationalism in the works of Beach

Charles Exner
Department of Music, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Ludwig Rivera
School of Ethnomusicology, Brandeis University

1. Expressions of paradigm

The characteristic focus of MacCarthy's[1] analysis of textual rationalism is neither ambiguity, nor pre-ambiguity, but instead meta-ambiguity. It could be said that the modulation, or as some might say realist, cryptographicist form, can be observed, ironically, in mm. 175-202 of Mahler's Fourth Symphony, although in a more textual sense in measures 114-116 and paraphrased in 61-69. In a sense, McClary's essay on cultural canon states that context must come from the performer. Hence where outdated, conservative elitisms try to reinforce neoliberal performance, the contributions of ethnomusicological approaches, on the other hand, attack performance and foreground queer performance, upholding the bystander. My auto-ethnographical discoveries relating to "structural" post-romanticism promote a sociology of identity in the Marxian-narrativeist mode (in contrast to neo-Schenkerian "scientific" theory).

In the works of Adorno, the most important concept is the conception of romantic composition. But what does this really imply? In a larger sense, for instance, Eco uses the term "textual rationalism" to denote a self-justifying entity. In a sense, academe's deconstructing of disability examines the post-romanticist concepts of expression. The dialectic, or as some might say uncritical sensitivity, is also evident in mm. 276-304 of Oliveros's Deep Listening throughout bars 164-184 and (in retrograde) in 224-245.

Though Cusick stated that musical form is part of the failure of art, the subtle ideas of Friedland[2] show that in a way, musical form is not part of the failure of art, but it is instead the futility, and some would say the newness, of musical form that is part of the failure of art. Yet would Sherr, seeking only to escape romantic cultural canon, respell, or indeed analyse, music? Although globalizations entrench masculine language, subcultures challenge language and overcome by sustaining feminine language, foregrounding textual rationalism. (Massey[3]) But any number of theorizings relating to both self-prolongation and pre-self-prolongation persist. (The principal idea of Brinkmann's[4] critique of textual post-romanticism is a de-cultural worth system.) In a larger sense, as an example, Eco uses the term "textual rationalism" to denote a nationalist paradox. It could be said that "structural" post-romanticism suggests that the purpose of the improviser is progression, given that Marx's model of textual rationalism is to be believed.

My discoveries about the role of the artist as listener found that a statement like "the concert hall is capable of clear depiction" cannot exist. Derrida suggests the use of sonorousist proto-theorizing to rehear and modify society. Wissner[5] states that we have to choose between cultural canon and McClaryist feminism. However, in "articles for the New Yorker," Ross indexes cultural canon; in "Listen to This", however, he affirms "structural" post-romanticism.

(The subject is manifested into a dialectic that merges culture with a totality.) Why must Brett decouple, some might say enrich, the stage, similarly seeking only to escape romantic cultural canon? The participant has a choice: either accept A. B. Marx's analysis of surrealist post-triadic theory or, alternatively, reject Solie's essay on surrealist post-triadic theory. Narrative's decoupling of physicality, and insistence on transposing the physicality, analyses, we could argue reenacts, textual rationalism.

Therefore where white, male, heterosexual musicologists try to reinforce capitalist memory, the contributions of interdisciplinary scholars, alternatively, read past memory and bolster Marxist memory, promoting women. (Rodin[6]) This collapse, or rather pigeonholing, quotes measures 217-241 of Cage's Composition as Process, albeit cursorily in mm. 69-71 and hinted at in 83-111, and somewhat subversively in the works of Berlioz. But should Bornist encompassment--paradoxically hampered by a romantic cultural canon--privilege the musicologist? In a sense, many performances concerning textual rationalism persist, each of which Stone denies in turn [7].

My personal prior publications concerning "structural" post-romanticism promote a sociology of sounds in the Chengian-theoryist style. Ergo, the Haupttema of Wright's[8] monograph on textual rationalism is not composition, as textual rationalism suggests, but all-too-composition. But Brett promotes the use of "structural" post-romanticism to attack the critic. If "conceptual" ambiguity be false, the works of Saariaho are postmodern. (The premise of cultural canon states that music has to have intrinsic meaning, given that politics is distinct from performance.)

2. Saariaho and neoliberist canon

If one confronts textual rationalism, one is faced with a dilemma: either accept the textual conception of performance or, perhaps surprisingly, conclude that truth is fundamentally a human construction. Brett uses the term ""structural" post-romanticism" to denote trans-, sub-, and meta-narrative. In a larger sense, Kelly[9] implies that we have to decide between neoliberist canon and queer musicology. The absurdity, or instead economy, can be seen in measures 174-200 of Shaw's String Quartets (taking its surroundings into account), and again in bars 243-246, 75-94, and inverted in 196-197.

"Sexuality is responsible for neoliberal, straight perceptions of history," writes Solomon. However, the composer-performer has a choice: one can reject Lewin's model of "structural" post-romanticism and consequently reject that context is a product of notated music, but only if composition is distinct from language; otherwise, one can assume that ambiguity is capable of intention or one can accept Cage's analysis of "structural" post-romanticism. The object is situated into a "structural" post-romanticism that subsumes scholarship under a worth system. However, music's decoding of disability vis-a-vis musical form reframes textual rationalism. My auto-ethnographical investigations relating to so-called cultural anthropological theory uncovered that a statement like "art is used to reinforce elitism" cannot be revealed (the Beckermanist resonances of this statement are obvious).

Several analysises concerning the defining characteristic, and subsequent stasis, of modernist society may be discovered, and every one must be enforced separately. Yet for whom would "structural" post-romanticism analyse, some should say obscure, the performer per se, itself a bit standing up to inter-modern proto-theorizing? It could be said that although globalizations respell outmoded culture, LGBTQ persons rehear culture and find success in empowering ambiguous culture, upholding neoliberist canon. The example of textual sonorousism which is a central argument of Saariaho's "Nymphea" emerges yet stronger in "Du cristal", though obviously cursorily.

But Heidegger suggests the use of textual rationalism to read around music. The theme of the works of Saariaho is the difference between language and music. (Straus's essay on disability musicology holds that the task of the participant is artistic comment.) In a sense, my auto-ethnographical previous thoughts about the role of the analyst as critic suggest a politic of remorse in the Abbateian-self-constructionist vein--not to write we should promote them.

Linklater[10] holds that we have to decide between textual rationalism and neoliberist canon. Thus e.g., Heidegger uses the term "Brettist musical closet" to denote a redundant whole. The paradigm, or instead genius, emerges again in measures 214-221 of Beach's Piano Quintet, to a serialist mindset throughout mm. 238-259 and paraphrased in 176-196, and in some oeuvre of Haydn. The improviser/observer has a choice: (a) reject Debussy's model of "structural" post-romanticism and reflexively be complicit in that the goal of the (ethno-)musicologist-critic is mere masturbation, or, on the contrary, (b) accept Besseler's essay on "structural" post-romanticism.

3. Analysises of failure

"We must transgress society before we contextualize society." So posited Koestenbaum in concluding "Hotel Theory". This idea has historical precedent: However, in the places where outmoded, fixed canons seek to reinforce elitist physicality, the contributions of women's rights, alternatively, problematize physicality and envoice Global physicality, advancing popular culture. Nevertheless why might modes of exclusion (defined by a super-"conceptual" performance) reinforce the bystander: which too is defined by a super-"conceptual" performance? A romantic proto-structuralist response is given in Saariaho's "...a la fumee". Hence composition's amplifying of history, and insistence instead on respelling the music prevalent in history, contrasts ecomusicological theory. (The individual is restated into a cultural rationalism qua rationalism that includes truth as a totality.)

"Memory is performance," says Eco; according to Saariaho[11] , it is not so much memory that is performance, but rather the sensitivity, and therefore the form, of memory. Cusick suggests the use of the clandestinist concept(s) of listening to read through sexism. In a larger sense, "I Drink the Air Before Me" reiterates East while "Mothertongue" examines West. It could be said that Marx's critique of textual rationalism holds that ambiguity, somewhat usefully, has real worth, but only if "structural" post-romanticism is valid; if that is not the case, expression comes from the musician, given that Adorno's monograph on Derridaist postmodernism is a challenge. Any number of compositions relating to neoliberist canon exist.

In the works of Muhly, a primary concept is the defining of neo-bimusicalist composition. (My previous thoughts concerning both ambiguity and de-ambiguity found that a statement like "sexuality is unattainable" cannot exist.) If deconstructionist canonical theory be true, we have to choose between textual rationalism and "structural" post-romanticism. The focus characterizing the works of Muhly is the futility, and eventually the newness, of "scientific" society. For instance, Derrida uses the term "neoliberist canon" to denote the modulation of post-feminist society.

In a sense, the artist has a paradox: either reject Babbitt's essay on "structural" post-romanticism or reject McClary's model of "structural" post-romanticism and subsequently be complicit in that musicology is capable of content. But the defining characteristic quotes bars 187-197 of Mahler's Kindertotenlieder (contra Cage [12]) throughout mm. 235-237 and 96-102. Ergo, although hierarchies entrench conservative scholarship, multicultural thinkers challenge scholarship and overcome by sustaining liberal scholarship, advancing neoliberist canon. (Cumming[13]) But when could, we must insist can, textual proto-appropriation, perhaps ironically constrained by a cultural postmodernist narrative, negate, indeed conclude, music? Kramer suggests the use of the textual concept(s) of analysis to read and problematize society.

Ergo, in "1,000,000 Years of Music," Tomlinson affirms neoliberist canon; in "Metaphysical Song", though, he changes his stance completely, instead being concerned with "structural" post-romanticism. (Wagner's analysis of Gesamtkunstwerk suggests that politics has real worth, but only if language vis-a-vis truth is in binary opposition to disability; otherwise, one can believe that the purpose of the musicologist is clear depiction.) Society's analyzing of musical form analyses textual rationalism.

The individual is manifested into a romantic romanticism that subsumes art under a paradox. The listener has a dilemma: either accept Cheng's essay on neoliberist canon or, on the other hand, reject Solomon's monograph on neoliberist canon and rightly accept that culture serves to marginalize diverse actors. In a larger sense, an abundance of improvisations concerning cultural hermeneuticist theory cannot exist.

Kramer uses the term ""structural" post-romanticism" to denote a self-fulfilling worth system. However, though inflexible homophobias aim to reinforce cisgendered physicality, the contributions of ethnomusicological approaches attack physicality and sustain transgendered physicality, empowering the Other. Hence Girard[14] states that we have to choose between textual rationalism and "structural" post-romanticism. It could be said that the primary thesis of Planchart's[15] critique of Heideggerist Da-sein is the bridge between music and society.

4. Neoliberist canon and the all-too-"scientific" ideal of context

"We must challenge sexuality before we can begin to contextualize sexuality." So posited McClary in the preface of "Feminine Endings" (separate from "cryptographic" minimalism). How might textual rationalism (rather seeking only to escape pre-urbanist "scientific" theory) decouple the orchestra (itself hampered by a trans-nationalist Schenkerianist performance)? The solution is unmistakable. My unpublished discoveries relating to the all-too-"scientific" ideal of context promote a politic of new perspectives in the Strausian-self-triadicismist mode (the Mannist influences of this belief are plain). This obligation, or rather collapse, is also evident in mm. 48-65 of Reich's Violin Phase in measures 241-245, 155-166, and hinted at in 105-120 (also foreshadowed somewhat surprisingly in the pieces of Bach).

The main theme of the works of Tomlinson is the absurdity, and subsequent pigeonholing, of textual society. (Brett suggests the use of the all-too-"scientific" ideal of context to problematize the status quo.) Many appropriations about the role of the composer as participant per se are found, each Bent indexes in turn [16]. In a larger sense, the example of "structural" post-romanticism prevalent in Glass's "Contrary Motion" emerges yet stronger in "Music, Sound and Space". Eco's model of textual rationalism implies that the significance of the composer is prolongation. Music's voicing of history, and insistence rather on contextualizing the semiotics of history, espouses modern performance.

In a sense, the object is situated into a "structural" post-romanticism that includes composition as a entity. Thus the analyst has a paradox: (a) reject Tymoczko's essay on Abbateist voicelessness, or (b) accept Feldman's analysis of Abbateist voicelessness and rightly reject that memory is capable of content, given that the premise of the all-too-"scientific" ideal of context is invalid. But the idea of Katz's[17] essay on textual rationalism is not, in fact, ambiguity, but sub-ambiguity. My publications about "structural" post-romanticism revealed that a statement like "academe is part of the failure of ambiguity" cannot be discovered--not to assert we shouldn't attempt it. E.g., Abbate uses the term "textual rationalism" to denote the difference between scholarship and music.

Yet why would Mockus rehear the (ethno-)musicologist-observer, conversely ironically defined by quasiromantic theory? (If the all-too-"scientific" ideal of context is false, we have to pick between "structural" post-romanticism and cultural discrete theory.) Where musicologists respell art performance, gay studies, on the contrary, read through performance and surmount by enriching popular performance, foregrounding "structural" post-romanticism. (Bellmann[18]) The withinness/withoutness distinction depicted in Williams's "Schindler's List" emerges again in "Imperial March" (in the background).

In a larger sense, a number of compositions concerning the sensitivity, and subsequent economy, of "material" culture vis-a-vis politics exist. However, Marx promotes the use of textual rationalism to attack modes of exclusion. Ergo, the musicker is restated into a romanticism qua romanticist concept of composition that encompasses truth within a entity.

At last, it is trivial that the relationships among textual rationalism, "structural" post-romanticism, and the all-too-"scientific" ideal of context (even ignoring meta-surrealist structuralist theory, which we have barely had space to touch upon) are moving in the direction of a experimentalist goal. Further study of Williams's works, in particular Star Wars, in conjunction with Bornist encompassment and the critic's "scientific" canon will be the key to progression.

1. MacCarthy, Gina ed./trans. (1913) Textual rationalism against "structural" post-romanticism. W.W. Norton

2. Friedland, Ll. (1876) Minimalism, textual rationalism, and "semiotic" canon. Wesleyan University Press

3. Massey, Stephen ed. (1949) Textual rationalism in the works of Fuller. M.I.T. Press

4. Brinkmann, F. (2008) Compositions of Obligation: Textual rationalism, Radiohead, and minimalism. Indiana University Press

5. Wissner, Bettina ed./trans. (1980) Textual rationalism in the writings of Ross. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Press

6. Rodin, A. ed. (2011) "structural" post-romanticism in the works of Crawford. Scarecrow Press

7. Stone, Rudolf (2017) "structural" post-romanticism in the music of Saariaho. McGraw Hill

8. Wright, E. ed. (1872) Textual rationalism after Beyonce. W.W. Norton

9. Kelly, Henry (1993) Materialist experimentalism, minimalism, and textual rationalism. Tufts University Press

10. Linklater, G. E. D. ed./trans. (1917) Entrenching politics/Instating ourselves: Textual rationalism in the music of Ueno. University of North Texas Press

11. Saariaho, Hans (2009) Textual rationalism in the music of Muhly. Scarecrow Press

12. Cage, P. (1975) Narratives of Dialectic: Textual rationalism in the writings of Tomlinson. Wesleyan University Press

13. Cumming, Samuel ed. (1889) "structural" post-romanticism and textual rationalism. Cambridge University Press

14. Girard, Y. K. (2015) Textual rationalism and "structural" post-romanticism. Edward Mellyn Press

15. Planchart, Andreas ed./trans. (2006) Augmented/Diminished: Textual rationalism in the works of Monk. M.I.T. Press

16. Bent, M. (1993) Textual rationalism in the works of Glass. Indiana University Press

17. Katz, Arni (1874) Paradigm the Performance: Minimalism, textual rationalism, and Williams. W.W. Norton

18. Bellmann, S. ed. (1980) Cultural Proto-prolongations: "structural" post-romanticism without textual rationalism. Scarecrow Press

Automatic bad new musicology paper generator: based on the Postmodernist essay generator and the Dada engine.


In the further interest of self-parody, I am starting work on an Old Musicology random essay generator; please email me with ideas. All I know is that every paper will begin "On f. 3v, a new watermark ..." etc.